Out of the thousands of prospective litigation funding opportunities reviewed by our veteran underwriting team, less than 5% are approved for investment, yielding strong results.
Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Returns are based on principal's internal reporting for offerings through the LexShares platform reaching resolution as of December 31, 2020. Results reported reflect the simple median annualized rate of return per the xirr function, net of fees and expenses. Diversification does not guarantee profits or protect against losses
Open investments
LexShares Marketplace Fund II
$100M
Marketplace Fund
LexShares Marketplace Fund II (LMFII) enables investors to gain exposure to multiple litigation finance assets through one investment vehicle.
Plaintiffs are eligible to submit claims directly for review.
1
Apply
Submit your application for funding and execute NDA.
2
Review
LexShares' team reviews your case.
3
Approve
LexShares sends a contract detailing terms of funding.
4
Fund
Contract executed and funding deployed.
Some of our recent investments
LexShares invests in a wide range of litigation finance assets, from single commercial matters, to portfolios, to direct law firm fundings. Below is a look at some recently funded deals, or you can view all of our case investments here.
Multiple Plaintiffs vs. Multiple Defendants
100% Funded
$1.15M
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by the contingency fees related to a portfolio of legal claims.
IT Reseller vs. Fortune 100 Company
100% Funded
$2.20M
Closed
Breach of Contract; Fraud
A Fortune 100 company allegedly sold counterfeit equipment to an IT reseller.
Supplier vs. Manufacturer
100% Funded
$2.00M
Closed
False Advertising; Antitrust
Defendant allegedly breached its non-disclosure agreement with plaintiff, misappropriated trade secrets, and interfered with plaintiff's business.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Confidential Defendants
100% Funded
$300K
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
Confidential Plaintiff vs. Municipality
100% Funded
$300K
Closed
Complex Tort
Plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of the alleged negligence of the Defendants.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Insurance Companies
100% Funded
$250K
Closed
Law Firm Funding
Defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme to sell products to Plaintiffs through illegal means.
Shareholders vs. Company
100% Funded
$2.00M
Closed
Fraud
Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Confidential Defendants
100% Funded
$4.00M
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
Confidential Plaintiff vs. Confidential Defendant
100% Funded
$750K
Resolved
Breach of Contract
This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
Multiple Plaintiffs vs. Multiple Defendants
100% Funded
$1.15M
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by the contingency fees related to a portfolio of legal claims.
IT Reseller vs. Fortune 100 Company
100% Funded
$2.20M
Closed
Breach of Contract; Fraud
A Fortune 100 company allegedly sold counterfeit equipment to an IT reseller.
Supplier vs. Manufacturer
100% Funded
$2.00M
Closed
False Advertising; Antitrust
Defendant allegedly breached its non-disclosure agreement with plaintiff, misappropriated trade secrets, and interfered with plaintiff's business.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Confidential Defendants
100% Funded
$300K
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
Confidential Plaintiff vs. Municipality
100% Funded
$300K
Closed
Complex Tort
Plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of the alleged negligence of the Defendants.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Insurance Companies
100% Funded
$250K
Closed
Law Firm Funding
Defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme to sell products to Plaintiffs through illegal means.
Shareholders vs. Company
100% Funded
$2.00M
Closed
Fraud
Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Confidential Defendants
100% Funded
$4.00M
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
Confidential Plaintiff vs. Confidential Defendant
100% Funded
$750K
Resolved
Breach of Contract
This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
Multiple Plaintiffs vs. Multiple Defendants
100% Funded
$1.15M
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by the contingency fees related to a portfolio of legal claims.
IT Reseller vs. Fortune 100 Company
100% Funded
$2.20M
Closed
Breach of Contract; Fraud
A Fortune 100 company allegedly sold counterfeit equipment to an IT reseller.
Supplier vs. Manufacturer
100% Funded
$2.00M
Closed
False Advertising; Antitrust
Defendant allegedly breached its non-disclosure agreement with plaintiff, misappropriated trade secrets, and interfered with plaintiff's business.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Confidential Defendants
100% Funded
$300K
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
Confidential Plaintiff vs. Municipality
100% Funded
$300K
Closed
Complex Tort
Plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of the alleged negligence of the Defendants.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Insurance Companies
100% Funded
$250K
Closed
Law Firm Funding
Defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme to sell products to Plaintiffs through illegal means.
Shareholders vs. Company
100% Funded
$2.00M
Closed
Fraud
Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Confidential Defendants
100% Funded
$4.00M
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
Confidential Plaintiff vs. Confidential Defendant
100% Funded
$750K
Resolved
Breach of Contract
This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
Multiple Plaintiffs vs. Multiple Defendants
100% Funded
$1.15M
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by the contingency fees related to a portfolio of legal claims.
IT Reseller vs. Fortune 100 Company
100% Funded
$2.20M
Closed
Breach of Contract; Fraud
A Fortune 100 company allegedly sold counterfeit equipment to an IT reseller.
Supplier vs. Manufacturer
100% Funded
$2.00M
Closed
False Advertising; Antitrust
Defendant allegedly breached its non-disclosure agreement with plaintiff, misappropriated trade secrets, and interfered with plaintiff's business.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Confidential Defendants
100% Funded
$300K
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
Confidential Plaintiff vs. Municipality
100% Funded
$300K
Closed
Complex Tort
Plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of the alleged negligence of the Defendants.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Insurance Companies
100% Funded
$250K
Closed
Law Firm Funding
Defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme to sell products to Plaintiffs through illegal means.
Shareholders vs. Company
100% Funded
$2.00M
Closed
Fraud
Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Confidential Defendants
100% Funded
$4.00M
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
Confidential Plaintiff vs. Confidential Defendant
100% Funded
$750K
Resolved
Breach of Contract
This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
Multiple Plaintiffs vs. Multiple Defendants
100% Funded
$1.15M
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by the contingency fees related to a portfolio of legal claims.
IT Reseller vs. Fortune 100 Company
100% Funded
$2.20M
Closed
Breach of Contract; Fraud
A Fortune 100 company allegedly sold counterfeit equipment to an IT reseller.
Supplier vs. Manufacturer
100% Funded
$2.00M
Closed
False Advertising; Antitrust
Defendant allegedly breached its non-disclosure agreement with plaintiff, misappropriated trade secrets, and interfered with plaintiff's business.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Confidential Defendants
100% Funded
$300K
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
Confidential Plaintiff vs. Municipality
100% Funded
$300K
Closed
Complex Tort
Plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of the alleged negligence of the Defendants.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Insurance Companies
100% Funded
$250K
Closed
Law Firm Funding
Defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme to sell products to Plaintiffs through illegal means.
Shareholders vs. Company
100% Funded
$2.00M
Closed
Fraud
Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Confidential Defendants
100% Funded
$4.00M
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
Confidential Plaintiff vs. Confidential Defendant
100% Funded
$750K
Resolved
Breach of Contract
This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
Multiple Plaintiffs vs. Multiple Defendants
100% Funded
$1.15M
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by the contingency fees related to a portfolio of legal claims.
IT Reseller vs. Fortune 100 Company
100% Funded
$2.20M
Closed
Breach of Contract; Fraud
A Fortune 100 company allegedly sold counterfeit equipment to an IT reseller.
Supplier vs. Manufacturer
100% Funded
$2.00M
Closed
False Advertising; Antitrust
Defendant allegedly breached its non-disclosure agreement with plaintiff, misappropriated trade secrets, and interfered with plaintiff's business.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Confidential Defendants
100% Funded
$300K
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
Confidential Plaintiff vs. Municipality
100% Funded
$300K
Closed
Complex Tort
Plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of the alleged negligence of the Defendants.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Insurance Companies
100% Funded
$250K
Closed
Law Firm Funding
Defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme to sell products to Plaintiffs through illegal means.
Shareholders vs. Company
100% Funded
$2.00M
Closed
Fraud
Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Confidential Defendants
100% Funded
$4.00M
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
Confidential Plaintiff vs. Confidential Defendant
100% Funded
$750K
Resolved
Breach of Contract
This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
Multiple Plaintiffs vs. Multiple Defendants
100% Funded
$1.15M
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by the contingency fees related to a portfolio of legal claims.
IT Reseller vs. Fortune 100 Company
100% Funded
$2.20M
Closed
Breach of Contract; Fraud
A Fortune 100 company allegedly sold counterfeit equipment to an IT reseller.
Supplier vs. Manufacturer
100% Funded
$2.00M
Closed
False Advertising; Antitrust
Defendant allegedly breached its non-disclosure agreement with plaintiff, misappropriated trade secrets, and interfered with plaintiff's business.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Confidential Defendants
100% Funded
$300K
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
Confidential Plaintiff vs. Municipality
100% Funded
$300K
Closed
Complex Tort
Plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of the alleged negligence of the Defendants.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Insurance Companies
100% Funded
$250K
Closed
Law Firm Funding
Defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme to sell products to Plaintiffs through illegal means.
Shareholders vs. Company
100% Funded
$2.00M
Closed
Fraud
Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
Confidential Plaintiffs vs. Confidential Defendants
100% Funded
$4.00M
Closed
Law Firm Funding
This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
Confidential Plaintiff vs. Confidential Defendant
100% Funded
$750K
Resolved
Breach of Contract
This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
How we invest.
LexShares uses a multi-channel investment approach to ensure speed and certainty of funds.
LexShares Marketplace Fund
In June 2020, LexShares launched its second privately managed fund, a $100 million fully discretionary litigation finance fund that gets deployed into each legal investment made by LexShares.
LexShares Funding Platform
LexShares operates an online platform that enables institutional and individual accredited investors to participate in certain funding opportunities. Offerings are typically fully funded by LexShares prior to being made available to investors.