What are the benefits of investing in litigation finance assets?
Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Returns are based on principal's internal reporting for offerings through the LexShares platform reaching resolution as of December 31, 2019. Results reported reflect the simple median annualized rate of return per the xirr function, net of fees and expenses. Diversification does not guarantee profits or protect against losses
The LexShares process
Accredited investors are eligible to invest on the LexShares platform.
Register online and get verified by LexShares.
Get notified when new cases are posted, and invest online.
Use your investor dashboard to track case progress.
If the plaintiff prevails, you could share in the recovery.
Some of our recent investments.
LexShares invests in a wide range of litigation finance assets, from single commercial matters, to portfolios, to direct law firm fundings. Below is a look at some recently funded deals, or you can view all of our case investments here.
In a claim related to a business acquisition, defendants allegedly fraudulently induced plaintiffs to purchase their company.
Fortune 500 Company
Defendant allegedly infringed on Plaintiff's registered patent without authorization.
This is a law firm funding to be collateralized by the contingency fees related to a portfolio of legal claims.
Fortune 500 Company
Defendants allegedly misappropriated Plaintiff's trade secrets after executives breached non-disclosure agreements.
The settlor of a number of revocable trusts was allegedly defrauded and deceived into giving control of his trusts' assets to its beneficiaries,...
Real Estate Investor
Plaintiff, the minority owner in a two-member LLC, brings an arbitration demand against its business partner and its financing affiliate for...
Gig Economy Companies
This is a law firm funding for a firm representing numerous plaintiffs against a number of gig economy companies, which have allegedly failed to...
Defendants allegedly infringed on Plaintiff's copyrighted works by using them without consent to create a popular children’s cartoon.
Plaintiffs assert that Defendants' installation and use of various related technologies allegedly infringe on multiple patents held by Plaintiff.