A new LexShares investment opportunity opens Tuesday, November 24 at 1:00 PM ET. Read the details here

Log in

Not a LexShares investor yet? Sign Up →

A new LexShares investment opportunity opens Tuesday, November 24 at 1:00 PM ET. Read the details here

Log in

Not a LexShares investor yet? Sign Up →

There is a new LexShares opportunity available for investment.

Supporting law firms, businesses, and legal departments.

We offer attorneys, law firms, plaintiffs and in-house legal departments flexible, non-recourse capital through our online marketplace and dedicated litigation finance fund.

Launching soon

Confidential Plaintiff vs.
Fortune 500 Company
Open Soon
$1.00M
Deal Size
Products Liability
This is a products liability claim against a multinational Fortune 500 manufacturer relating to the use of its product.

How LexShares & litigation finance works.

LexShares invests in commercial lawsuits in exchange for a portion of any potential recovery.
For Attorneys & Plaintiffs
LexShares offers attorneys and plaintiffs flexible, non-recourse funding to cover legal expenses, expert witnesses, working capital and more. In exchange for our investment, we share in any potential monetary recovery.
For Investors
LexShares offers accredited investors the opportunity to invest in legal claims through both our online platform and dedicated funds. Investors earn returns based on recoveries if plaintiffs prevail in their litigation.

Your leading-edge litigation funding partner.

We ensure speed and certainty of funds.
We manage multiple pools of capital including fully discretionary private funds and a platform of thousands of accredited investors.
We transact ethically and professionally.
Our team has decades of combined litigation finance experience, and adheres to the highest standards of professional responsibility.
We work with the best firms.
From Am Law 100 firms to leading litigation boutiques, we provide financing solutions to top law firms both large and small.
We add value beyond capital.
With access to exclusive partnerships across key litigation support categories, our clients benefit from more than just funding.
Our team of former litigators understands the importance of transacting efficiently so that your focus always remains on litigating. Our innovative financing solutions enable us to finance matters expeditiously.

Some of our recent investments

LexShares invests in a wide range of litigation finance assets, from single commercial matters, to portfolios, to direct law firm fundings. Below is a look at some recently funded deals, or you can view all of our case investments here.
  • IT Reseller vs.
    Fortune 100 Company
    100% Funded
    $2.20M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract; Fraud
    A Fortune 100 company allegedly sold counterfeit equipment to an IT reseller.
  • Supplier vs.
    Manufacturer
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    False Advertising; Antitrust
    Defendant allegedly breached its non-disclosure agreement with plaintiff, misappropriated trade secrets, and interfered with plaintiff's business.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $300K
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Municipality
    100% Funded
    $300K
    Closed
    Complex Tort
    Plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of the alleged negligence of the Defendants.
  • Confidential Plaintiffs vs.
    Insurance Companies
    100% Funded
    $250K
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    Defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme to sell products to Plaintiffs through illegal means.
  • Shareholders vs.
    Company
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Fraud
    Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $4.00M
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Confidential Defendant
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Government Entity
    100% Funded
    $475K
    Closed
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    Plaintiff alleges that Government Entity, in its capacity as trustee, breached duties to plaintiff by mismanaging plaintiff's assets.
  • IT Reseller vs.
    Fortune 100 Company
    100% Funded
    $2.20M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract; Fraud
    A Fortune 100 company allegedly sold counterfeit equipment to an IT reseller.
  • Supplier vs.
    Manufacturer
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    False Advertising; Antitrust
    Defendant allegedly breached its non-disclosure agreement with plaintiff, misappropriated trade secrets, and interfered with plaintiff's business.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $300K
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Municipality
    100% Funded
    $300K
    Closed
    Complex Tort
    Plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of the alleged negligence of the Defendants.
  • Confidential Plaintiffs vs.
    Insurance Companies
    100% Funded
    $250K
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    Defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme to sell products to Plaintiffs through illegal means.
  • Shareholders vs.
    Company
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Fraud
    Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $4.00M
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Confidential Defendant
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Government Entity
    100% Funded
    $475K
    Closed
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    Plaintiff alleges that Government Entity, in its capacity as trustee, breached duties to plaintiff by mismanaging plaintiff's assets.
  • IT Reseller vs.
    Fortune 100 Company
    100% Funded
    $2.20M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract; Fraud
    A Fortune 100 company allegedly sold counterfeit equipment to an IT reseller.
  • Supplier vs.
    Manufacturer
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    False Advertising; Antitrust
    Defendant allegedly breached its non-disclosure agreement with plaintiff, misappropriated trade secrets, and interfered with plaintiff's business.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $300K
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Municipality
    100% Funded
    $300K
    Closed
    Complex Tort
    Plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of the alleged negligence of the Defendants.
  • Confidential Plaintiffs vs.
    Insurance Companies
    100% Funded
    $250K
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    Defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme to sell products to Plaintiffs through illegal means.
  • Shareholders vs.
    Company
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Fraud
    Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $4.00M
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Confidential Defendant
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Government Entity
    100% Funded
    $475K
    Closed
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    Plaintiff alleges that Government Entity, in its capacity as trustee, breached duties to plaintiff by mismanaging plaintiff's assets.
  • IT Reseller vs.
    Fortune 100 Company
    100% Funded
    $2.20M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract; Fraud
    A Fortune 100 company allegedly sold counterfeit equipment to an IT reseller.
  • Supplier vs.
    Manufacturer
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    False Advertising; Antitrust
    Defendant allegedly breached its non-disclosure agreement with plaintiff, misappropriated trade secrets, and interfered with plaintiff's business.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $300K
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Municipality
    100% Funded
    $300K
    Closed
    Complex Tort
    Plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of the alleged negligence of the Defendants.
  • Confidential Plaintiffs vs.
    Insurance Companies
    100% Funded
    $250K
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    Defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme to sell products to Plaintiffs through illegal means.
  • Shareholders vs.
    Company
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Fraud
    Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $4.00M
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Confidential Defendant
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Government Entity
    100% Funded
    $475K
    Closed
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    Plaintiff alleges that Government Entity, in its capacity as trustee, breached duties to plaintiff by mismanaging plaintiff's assets.
  • IT Reseller vs.
    Fortune 100 Company
    100% Funded
    $2.20M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract; Fraud
    A Fortune 100 company allegedly sold counterfeit equipment to an IT reseller.
  • Supplier vs.
    Manufacturer
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    False Advertising; Antitrust
    Defendant allegedly breached its non-disclosure agreement with plaintiff, misappropriated trade secrets, and interfered with plaintiff's business.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $300K
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Municipality
    100% Funded
    $300K
    Closed
    Complex Tort
    Plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of the alleged negligence of the Defendants.
  • Confidential Plaintiffs vs.
    Insurance Companies
    100% Funded
    $250K
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    Defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme to sell products to Plaintiffs through illegal means.
  • Shareholders vs.
    Company
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Fraud
    Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $4.00M
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Confidential Defendant
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Government Entity
    100% Funded
    $475K
    Closed
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    Plaintiff alleges that Government Entity, in its capacity as trustee, breached duties to plaintiff by mismanaging plaintiff's assets.
  • IT Reseller vs.
    Fortune 100 Company
    100% Funded
    $2.20M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract; Fraud
    A Fortune 100 company allegedly sold counterfeit equipment to an IT reseller.
  • Supplier vs.
    Manufacturer
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    False Advertising; Antitrust
    Defendant allegedly breached its non-disclosure agreement with plaintiff, misappropriated trade secrets, and interfered with plaintiff's business.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $300K
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Municipality
    100% Funded
    $300K
    Closed
    Complex Tort
    Plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of the alleged negligence of the Defendants.
  • Confidential Plaintiffs vs.
    Insurance Companies
    100% Funded
    $250K
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    Defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme to sell products to Plaintiffs through illegal means.
  • Shareholders vs.
    Company
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Fraud
    Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $4.00M
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Confidential Defendant
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Government Entity
    100% Funded
    $475K
    Closed
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    Plaintiff alleges that Government Entity, in its capacity as trustee, breached duties to plaintiff by mismanaging plaintiff's assets.
  • IT Reseller vs.
    Fortune 100 Company
    100% Funded
    $2.20M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract; Fraud
    A Fortune 100 company allegedly sold counterfeit equipment to an IT reseller.
  • Supplier vs.
    Manufacturer
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    False Advertising; Antitrust
    Defendant allegedly breached its non-disclosure agreement with plaintiff, misappropriated trade secrets, and interfered with plaintiff's business.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $300K
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Municipality
    100% Funded
    $300K
    Closed
    Complex Tort
    Plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries as a result of the alleged negligence of the Defendants.
  • Confidential Plaintiffs vs.
    Insurance Companies
    100% Funded
    $250K
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    Defendants allegedly engaged in a scheme to sell products to Plaintiffs through illegal means.
  • Shareholders vs.
    Company
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Fraud
    Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $4.00M
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Confidential Defendant
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Government Entity
    100% Funded
    $475K
    Closed
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    Plaintiff alleges that Government Entity, in its capacity as trustee, breached duties to plaintiff by mismanaging plaintiff's assets.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9

Invest in litigation finance, with LexShares.

With a median 47% net annualized return for resolved investments as of August 31, 2020, see why LexShares has become a leader in litigation finance investing.
Historical performance information is not indicative of future performance. Investments in legal claims are speculative, carry a high degree of risk and may result in loss of entire investment. Investments in legal claims may be subject to long holding requirements, and are intended for investors who do not need a liquid investment. Returns are based on principal’s internal reporting for offerings through the LexShares platform reaching resolution as of August 31, 2020. Results reported reflect the simple median annualized rate of return per the xirr function, net of fees and expenses. Diversification does not guarantee profits or protect against losses.