LexShares Marketplace Fund II is now open to investors. Learn more here →

Menu

There is a new LexShares opportunity available for investment.

Supporting law firms, businesses, and legal departments.

We offer attorneys, law firms, plaintiffs and in-house legal departments flexible, non-recourse capital through our online marketplace and dedicated litigation finance fund.

Open investments

LexShares Marketplace Fund II
$100M
Marketplace Fund
LexShares Marketplace Fund II (LMFII) enables investors to gain exposure to multiple litigation finance assets through one investment vehicle.

How LexShares & litigation finance works.

LexShares invests in commercial lawsuits in exchange for a portion of any potential recovery.
For Attorneys & Plaintiffs
LexShares offers attorneys and plaintiffs flexible, non-recourse funding to cover legal expenses, expert witnesses, working capital and more. In exchange for our investment, we share in any potential monetary recovery.
For Investors
LexShares offers accredited investors the opportunity to invest in legal claims through both our online platform and dedicated funds. Investors earn returns based on recoveries if plaintiffs prevail in their litigation.

Your leading-edge litigation funding partner.

We ensure speed and certainty of funds.
We manage multiple pools of capital including fully discretionary private funds and a platform of thousands of accredited investors.
We transact ethically and professionally.
Our team has decades of combined litigation finance experience, and adheres to the highest standards of professional responsibility.
We work with the best firms.
From Am Law 100 firms to leading litigation boutiques, we provide financing solutions to top law firms both large and small.
We add value beyond capital.
With access to exclusive partnerships across key litigation support categories, our clients benefit from more than just funding.
Our team of former litigators understands the importance of transacting efficiently so that your focus always remains on litigating. Our innovative financing solutions enable us to finance matters expeditiously.

Some of our recent investments

LexShares invests in a wide range of litigation finance assets, from single commercial matters, to portfolios, to direct law firm fundings. Below is a look at some recently funded deals, or you can view all of our case investments here.
  • Shareholders vs.
    Company
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Fraud
    Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $4.00M
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Confidential Defendant
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Government Entity
    100% Funded
    $475K
    Closed
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    Plaintiff alleges that Government Entity, in its capacity as trustee, breached duties to plaintiff by mismanaging plaintiff's assets.
  • Engineering Firm vs.
    Manufacturer
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    Defendant allegedly breached agreements with plaintiffs by failing to pay contractual royalties due and misappropriating plaintiffs' trade secrets.
  • Investor vs.
    Finance Company
    100% Funded
    $1.13M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    Defendants allegedly failed to repay certain proceeds owed to Plaintiff relating to investments in Defendants’ business.
  • Real Estate Developer vs.
    Business Partner
    100% Funded
    $3.50M
    Closed
    Settlement
    This is a settlement acceleration related to a number of real estate disputes with a negotiated and executed settlement.
  • Acquiror vs.
    Seller
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    In a claim related to a business acquisition, defendants allegedly fraudulently induced plaintiffs to purchase their company.
  • Technology Company vs.
    Fortune 500 Company
    100% Funded
    $1.20M
    Closed
    Patent Infringement
    Defendant allegedly infringed on Plaintiff's registered patent without authorization.
  • Shareholders vs.
    Company
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Fraud
    Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $4.00M
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Confidential Defendant
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Government Entity
    100% Funded
    $475K
    Closed
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    Plaintiff alleges that Government Entity, in its capacity as trustee, breached duties to plaintiff by mismanaging plaintiff's assets.
  • Engineering Firm vs.
    Manufacturer
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    Defendant allegedly breached agreements with plaintiffs by failing to pay contractual royalties due and misappropriating plaintiffs' trade secrets.
  • Investor vs.
    Finance Company
    100% Funded
    $1.13M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    Defendants allegedly failed to repay certain proceeds owed to Plaintiff relating to investments in Defendants’ business.
  • Real Estate Developer vs.
    Business Partner
    100% Funded
    $3.50M
    Closed
    Settlement
    This is a settlement acceleration related to a number of real estate disputes with a negotiated and executed settlement.
  • Acquiror vs.
    Seller
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    In a claim related to a business acquisition, defendants allegedly fraudulently induced plaintiffs to purchase their company.
  • Technology Company vs.
    Fortune 500 Company
    100% Funded
    $1.20M
    Closed
    Patent Infringement
    Defendant allegedly infringed on Plaintiff's registered patent without authorization.
  • Shareholders vs.
    Company
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Fraud
    Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $4.00M
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Confidential Defendant
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Government Entity
    100% Funded
    $475K
    Closed
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    Plaintiff alleges that Government Entity, in its capacity as trustee, breached duties to plaintiff by mismanaging plaintiff's assets.
  • Engineering Firm vs.
    Manufacturer
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    Defendant allegedly breached agreements with plaintiffs by failing to pay contractual royalties due and misappropriating plaintiffs' trade secrets.
  • Investor vs.
    Finance Company
    100% Funded
    $1.13M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    Defendants allegedly failed to repay certain proceeds owed to Plaintiff relating to investments in Defendants’ business.
  • Real Estate Developer vs.
    Business Partner
    100% Funded
    $3.50M
    Closed
    Settlement
    This is a settlement acceleration related to a number of real estate disputes with a negotiated and executed settlement.
  • Acquiror vs.
    Seller
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    In a claim related to a business acquisition, defendants allegedly fraudulently induced plaintiffs to purchase their company.
  • Technology Company vs.
    Fortune 500 Company
    100% Funded
    $1.20M
    Closed
    Patent Infringement
    Defendant allegedly infringed on Plaintiff's registered patent without authorization.
  • Shareholders vs.
    Company
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Fraud
    Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $4.00M
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Confidential Defendant
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Government Entity
    100% Funded
    $475K
    Closed
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    Plaintiff alleges that Government Entity, in its capacity as trustee, breached duties to plaintiff by mismanaging plaintiff's assets.
  • Engineering Firm vs.
    Manufacturer
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    Defendant allegedly breached agreements with plaintiffs by failing to pay contractual royalties due and misappropriating plaintiffs' trade secrets.
  • Investor vs.
    Finance Company
    100% Funded
    $1.13M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    Defendants allegedly failed to repay certain proceeds owed to Plaintiff relating to investments in Defendants’ business.
  • Real Estate Developer vs.
    Business Partner
    100% Funded
    $3.50M
    Closed
    Settlement
    This is a settlement acceleration related to a number of real estate disputes with a negotiated and executed settlement.
  • Acquiror vs.
    Seller
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    In a claim related to a business acquisition, defendants allegedly fraudulently induced plaintiffs to purchase their company.
  • Technology Company vs.
    Fortune 500 Company
    100% Funded
    $1.20M
    Closed
    Patent Infringement
    Defendant allegedly infringed on Plaintiff's registered patent without authorization.
  • Shareholders vs.
    Company
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Fraud
    Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $4.00M
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Confidential Defendant
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Government Entity
    100% Funded
    $475K
    Closed
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    Plaintiff alleges that Government Entity, in its capacity as trustee, breached duties to plaintiff by mismanaging plaintiff's assets.
  • Engineering Firm vs.
    Manufacturer
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    Defendant allegedly breached agreements with plaintiffs by failing to pay contractual royalties due and misappropriating plaintiffs' trade secrets.
  • Investor vs.
    Finance Company
    100% Funded
    $1.13M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    Defendants allegedly failed to repay certain proceeds owed to Plaintiff relating to investments in Defendants’ business.
  • Real Estate Developer vs.
    Business Partner
    100% Funded
    $3.50M
    Closed
    Settlement
    This is a settlement acceleration related to a number of real estate disputes with a negotiated and executed settlement.
  • Acquiror vs.
    Seller
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    In a claim related to a business acquisition, defendants allegedly fraudulently induced plaintiffs to purchase their company.
  • Technology Company vs.
    Fortune 500 Company
    100% Funded
    $1.20M
    Closed
    Patent Infringement
    Defendant allegedly infringed on Plaintiff's registered patent without authorization.
  • Shareholders vs.
    Company
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Fraud
    Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $4.00M
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Confidential Defendant
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Government Entity
    100% Funded
    $475K
    Closed
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    Plaintiff alleges that Government Entity, in its capacity as trustee, breached duties to plaintiff by mismanaging plaintiff's assets.
  • Engineering Firm vs.
    Manufacturer
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    Defendant allegedly breached agreements with plaintiffs by failing to pay contractual royalties due and misappropriating plaintiffs' trade secrets.
  • Investor vs.
    Finance Company
    100% Funded
    $1.13M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    Defendants allegedly failed to repay certain proceeds owed to Plaintiff relating to investments in Defendants’ business.
  • Real Estate Developer vs.
    Business Partner
    100% Funded
    $3.50M
    Closed
    Settlement
    This is a settlement acceleration related to a number of real estate disputes with a negotiated and executed settlement.
  • Acquiror vs.
    Seller
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    In a claim related to a business acquisition, defendants allegedly fraudulently induced plaintiffs to purchase their company.
  • Technology Company vs.
    Fortune 500 Company
    100% Funded
    $1.20M
    Closed
    Patent Infringement
    Defendant allegedly infringed on Plaintiff's registered patent without authorization.
  • Shareholders vs.
    Company
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Fraud
    Defendants allegedly defrauded plaintiffs, squeezing them out of their equity interest in the company.
  • Confidential plaintiffs vs.
    Confidential defendants
    100% Funded
    $4.00M
    Closed
    Law Firm Funding
    This is a law firm funding collateralized by a portfolio of cases in the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Confidential Defendant
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    This is a breach of contract case regarding division of property and valuation of stock options.
  • Confidential Plaintiff vs.
    Government Entity
    100% Funded
    $475K
    Closed
    Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    Plaintiff alleges that Government Entity, in its capacity as trustee, breached duties to plaintiff by mismanaging plaintiff's assets.
  • Engineering Firm vs.
    Manufacturer
    100% Funded
    $2.00M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    Defendant allegedly breached agreements with plaintiffs by failing to pay contractual royalties due and misappropriating plaintiffs' trade secrets.
  • Investor vs.
    Finance Company
    100% Funded
    $1.13M
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    Defendants allegedly failed to repay certain proceeds owed to Plaintiff relating to investments in Defendants’ business.
  • Real Estate Developer vs.
    Business Partner
    100% Funded
    $3.50M
    Closed
    Settlement
    This is a settlement acceleration related to a number of real estate disputes with a negotiated and executed settlement.
  • Acquiror vs.
    Seller
    100% Funded
    $750K
    Closed
    Breach of Contract
    In a claim related to a business acquisition, defendants allegedly fraudulently induced plaintiffs to purchase their company.
  • Technology Company vs.
    Fortune 500 Company
    100% Funded
    $1.20M
    Closed
    Patent Infringement
    Defendant allegedly infringed on Plaintiff's registered patent without authorization.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9

Invest in litigation finance, with LexShares.

With a median 52% net annualized return for resolved investments as of April 30, 2020, see why LexShares has become a leader in litigation finance investing.
Historical performance information is not indicative of future performance. Investments in legal claims are speculative, carry a high degree of risk and may result in loss of entire investment. Investments in legal claims may be subject to long holding requirements, and are intended for investors who do not need a liquid investment. Returns are based on principal’s internal reporting for offerings through the LexShares platform reaching resolution as of April 30, 2020. Results reported reflect the simple median annualized rate of return per the xirr function, net of fees and expenses. Diversification does not guarantee profits or protect against losses.